From 3e17efc6e72d39a86d767512f12877058811d49f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bazz2 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 11:58:21 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] [bazz2-ing] Performance benchmarks--KVM vs. Xen --- sources/talk/20140624 Performance benchmarks--KVM vs. Xen.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sources/talk/20140624 Performance benchmarks--KVM vs. Xen.md b/sources/talk/20140624 Performance benchmarks--KVM vs. Xen.md index b00ff11616..f67314307a 100644 --- a/sources/talk/20140624 Performance benchmarks--KVM vs. Xen.md +++ b/sources/talk/20140624 Performance benchmarks--KVM vs. Xen.md @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +[bazz2 own this article] Performance benchmarks: KVM vs. Xen ================================================================================ After having some interesting discussions last week around KVM and Xen performance improvements over the past years, I decided to do a little research on my own. The last complete set of benchmarks I could find were from the [Phoronix Haswell tests in 2013][1]. There were [some other benchmarks from 2011][2] but those were hotly debated due to the Xen patches headed into kernel 3.0. @@ -91,4 +92,4 @@ via: http://major.io/2014/06/22/performance-benchmarks-kvm-vs-xen/ [6]:http://www.infoworld.com/d/virtualization/red-hat-releases-first-kvm-support-rhel-54-376 [7]:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kmudbOjCDUgfw76b8qP2GqNqF1ddlTOKyOjc0GmNOIE/edit?usp=sharing [8]:http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ -[9]:https://twitter.com/comstud/status/480785742730252288 \ No newline at end of file +[9]:https://twitter.com/comstud/status/480785742730252288